On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote:
> I simplified things a bit in the attached version. Alright on i386/amd64,
> building it on arm now, has anyone tested on something big-endian?

Stuart,

Your tgz has a .Makefile.swp

Builds and run OK on macppc but I'm able to make it core consistently
in stage 3. That seems to be a application issue. It is on an assert
on line 225 in:

Box2D/Source/Collision/Shapes/b2PolygonShape.cpp

b2Assert(d.x >= 0.0f);

Or something like that (from memory ... not looking at the source
atm). If someone is really curious about how to reproduce this crash,
in stage 3 just draw an angled line from mid-page to right downwards
and make your cursor go off the app window.


Then there is this warning during 'make patch' (gmail will wrap lines -- sorry!)

$ make patch
===>  numptyphysics-0.3.r20090104 depends on: metaauto-* - found
===>  numptyphysics-0.3.r20090104 depends on: automake-1.9.* - found
===>  numptyphysics-0.3.r20090104 depends on: autoconf-2.61 - found
===>  numptyphysics-0.3.r20090104 depends on: bzip2-* - found
===>  numptyphysics-0.3.r20090104 depends on: sdl-* - found
===>  numptyphysics-0.3.r20090104 depends on: sdl-image-* - found
===>  Verifying specs: SDL SDL_image SDL SDL_image X11 c m pthread
stdc++ z X11 c m pthread stdc++ z
===>  found SDL.8.0 SDL_image.2.0 X11.11.1 c.50.0 m.5.0 pthread.11.1
stdc++.46.0 z.4.1
===>  Checking files for numptyphysics-0.3.r20090104
`/usr/ports/distfiles/numptyphysics-0.3.r20090104.tar.bz2' is up to date.
>> (SHA256) numptyphysics-0.3.r20090104.tar.bz2: OK
===>  Extracting for numptyphysics-0.3.r20090104
===>  Patching for numptyphysics-0.3.r20090104
/usr/local/share/aclocal/aalib.m4:12: warning: underquoted definition
of AM_PATH_AALIB
  run info '(automake)Extending aclocal'
  or see http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Extending-aclocal
Running autoconf-2.61 in
/usr/ports/mystuff/games/numptyphysics/w-numptyphysics-0.3.r20090104/numptyphysics


Not sure if this is critical or not.

--patrick

Reply via email to