On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 01:07:53PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:14:31AM +0000, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:28:06AM +0000, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> > > [resending to the list after maintainer timeout]
> > >
> > > Currently gcc-4.2.20070307p8 is required by libstdc++-4.2.20070307p4. Is
> > > it really the case? Please review attached diff. Thanks.
> >
> >
> > Third try. Any comments?
>
> I didn't try to compile this, but it is conceptually making sense..
> there's no need to have gcc installed to use packages depending on
> libestdc++.
> anyway, i think the only person who can judge that is espie.
>
> Landry
Yes, it slipped between the cracks. This is perfectly okay.
Go ahead !
