> From owner-ports+m32...@openbsd.org Fri Dec 19 00:00:38 2008
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>         d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
>         h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from
>          :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to
>          :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
>         bh=EVs7ou407Xxu8aYQG7IwyUREQwEBtLHZKHHUvLYlW2g=;
>         b=KfyJrT8Y60uytrvjqlTfOcM8jK4yr6tbIaoWoBo2YeEXnPGNmTLlTGca0128CgczIw
>          mw2O3cVTBQZPFBp2oKFl/zkWdv8CiSZ3d+ky0z8rLaGcPHyWcow7AlwNywUU3qEHrATp
>          +yxZW7M4KjDpfXenFMVe05HEE+N9Joc0ARJ5k=
> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
>         d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
>         h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
>          :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type
>          :content-transfer-encoding;
>         b=FD7OOqaT2Lp4JlGqXnohmxcDpopDRdOvBzwyfz2tgyTbaLYZM97ZcvvyPPuWTO+066
>          YuufpEWPoI55NtdKIKKVpxB0O0DzijhM97smk1nyhkz0lNwuqaI3ZrUICl0b8b2q69/H
>          OaT6HYd59XOi9ez5j4jmgEAkQW1pyiE4bKJmE=
> From: Brynet <bry...@gmail.com>
> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080812)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> To: ports@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: Firefox 3.0.5 question..
> References: <200812182103.mbil3ovb017...@landisk.altroot.org>
> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Loop: ports@openbsd.org
> Precedence: bulk
> Sender: owner-po...@openbsd.org
>
> Martynas Venckus wrote:
> > So...  What is your question?
> > 
> > Should it use nspr/nss?  Yes, because it's easier for me to maintain.
> >  The newer version of nspr 4.7.3 also fixes bugs that i wanted to be
> >  fixed.  There are no interface changes for 4.7.1 <=> 4.7.3.
> > 
> > Is there any real issue with that?  Could you also provide patch?
> > 
> > According to the bugzilla link you've provided Mozilla wants to ship
> >  firefox with nspr 4.7.3;  however only talk happened...
> > 
>
> Apologies if I wasn't clear.. but I was referring to the version of
> nss used by 3.0.5, it's newer then the version in the ports tree..
> 3.12.2 (rc1) vs 3.12, so far the only way to retreive it is CVS.
>
> When the firefox port is updated.. will it continue using nss 3.12? or
> will you have to roll a manual release?

Yup it has been updated today;  and it uses nss 3.12.

Reply via email to