On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 04:40:23PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Marc Espie <es...@nerim.net> wrote: > >> These are too easy to miss at some point after installation. > >> What does anyone think about doing something like this? > > > > Blech > > > > The issue is mostly to have less stuff displayed during installation, which > > is not yet done, but should be. > > The problem wasn't that I missed the message during installation, it's > that I couldn't find the message 8 months later. Now that I know > about -M, I can probably remember to use it, but it's a lot less > intuitive than plain pkg_info providing me with what I'd consider some > pretty critical information about the port.
Wow. Like, gcc tells you to use -W -Wall if you forget to mention them ? Or sh tells you to use set -e whenever it runs a shell script ?
