On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 08:14:52PM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote: > On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > mozilla is no longer maintaining mozilla. take your bitches to them. > > > > unless you are going to maintain mozilla 2.x branch, of course. > > I wasn't the original person "bitching" about ff2/ff3. and, you seem > to have missed the point made by another user, who pointed out the > fact there are many ports that are no longer maintained upstream that > happily exist in ports.
because someone is maintaining them. all I am saying is if you want something, make it happen. > >> I spoke up about cramming crap-load of needless dependencies into > >> ports w/o giving the end user a choice in the matter (e.g., building > >> gimp with python, etc.). I don't think it got me anywhere, but at > >> least i voiced my opinion. my voice doesn't carry much weight, but I > >> was hoping that logic would. > >> > >> It is one thing to make sure software available on linux platforms are > >> able to install and work on OpenBSD. It is completely another issue to > >> morph OpenBSD into linux with each package install. > > > > now you are volunteering to maintain all ports? > > > > wow, you must have a lot of free time. > > What the hell does that even mean? It's the third time you've said > that in this thread alone: "are you going to maintain it?" Having a > passive-aggressive moment are we? Can't counter logic so unless you > have it your way you threaten "to take your toys and leave the > sandbox?" what does "morph OpenBSD into linux mean"? > I've already accepted the explanation of build-time for packages for > not having FLAVORS for gimp, etc. It is how it is. But, there is no > good excuse for you to lash out and throw a hissy fit because someone > said something you don't agree with; especially when they have a valid > point. what was the point? sorry, but I didn't see any. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
