On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 12:42:42PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2008/12/07 12:23, Eric Faurot wrote: > > That is what I thought too at first, but this is very annoying and I don't > > think it is really worth the hassle: This change would have the same impact > > on the resulting packages as changing WRKOBJDIR when building them, which > > is not supposed to matter wrt to packages and updates anyway. > > The rules are quite straightforward, if it affects the packing list > or the files in the package, then the bump is necessary.
FWIW, I think in this particular case, bumping every single package is wrong, and I agree with Eric; let this happen as ports are updated. For most 99% of the python ports this won't be an issue and it's not like anybody has complained about this so far. f.-
