On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 02:54:50PM -0400, Brad wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 July 2008 15:00:27 Martynas Venckus wrote:
> > > From: Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > On Tuesday 15 July 2008 13:42:19 Brandon Mercer wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > > On 2008/07/15 13:07, Mike Erdely wrote:
> > > > >> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 04:37:13PM +0100, Edd wrote:
> > > > >> > Whats the status of firefox 3 on OpenBSD?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I have been using a package (given to me from viq, which i assume
> > > > >> > is made from this patch), which has crashed once in about 3 days.
> > > > >> > Thats about normal for firefox in my experience.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I do notice a fair speedup.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Like others, I see a fair speed up and I have only seen crashes with
> > > > >> self-signed certificates.
> > > > >
> > > > > From some of the feedback I've heard, it doesn't entirely ready to
> > > > > replace 2.x yet. I also note that upstream are not yet suggesting it
> > > > > as an automatic upgrade for 2.x users.
> > > > >
> > > > > I wouldn't oppose having both versions in tree, but wouldn't be too
> > > > > happy having 3.0 as the only Firefox version for the coming release.
> > > >
> > > > Agreed, the proper course should be to have both until the time comes
> > > > to do away with 2.x
> > > > Brandon
> > >
> > > IMO this is not realistic. We either stick with 2.x or go with 3.x, but
> > > not create a mess with both.
> >
> > There's nothing wrong with having it in tree.
> >
> > I think the best way to handle this was suggested by pval, a while
> > ago.  Import it (www/mozilla-firefox3, or www/mozilla-firefox-devel),
> > but not link to the builds yet.
> >
> > When we decide it's stable enough, reimport as www/mozilla-firefox.
> >
> > This would be easier both for me to work on further, and for people
> > to test.
> 
> Has anyone actually tested FF2 with newer NSPR/NSS to make sure there
> are no compatability issues?
 
FF2 builds fine with newer nspr/nss/sqlite3 on sparc64. Lightly tested.

Regards,
Markus

Reply via email to