* Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2008/07/15 13:07, Mike Erdely wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 04:37:13PM +0100, Edd wrote: > > > Whats the status of firefox 3 on OpenBSD? > > > > > > I have been using a package (given to me from viq, which i assume is > > > made from this patch), which has crashed once in about 3 days. Thats > > > about normal for firefox in my experience. > > > > > > I do notice a fair speedup. > > > > Like others, I see a fair speed up and I have only seen crashes with > > self-signed certificates. > > From some of the feedback I've heard, it doesn't entirely ready to > replace 2.x yet. I also note that upstream are not yet suggesting it > as an automatic upgrade for 2.x users. > > I wouldn't oppose having both versions in tree, but wouldn't be too > happy having 3.0 as the only Firefox version for the coming release.
there are still quite some issues with firefox 3, we had to go back to ff 2 at a large site because of these. certificates is only one problem area. there are other incompatabilities, e.g. with typo 3 sites (admin part). i would recommend against having firefox 3 only. when can stay at firefox 2, maybe there is not even to much sense in having both versions right now.
