On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:06:15AM -0600, macintoshzoom wrote: > The problem is (from my newly gnupg.1.4.9 port dir): > make install ... > Can't install gnupg-1.4.9 because of conflicts (gnupg-1.4.8) > /usr/sbin/pkg_add: gnupg-1.4.9-ldap:Fatal error > *** Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/ports/1/gnupg-1.4.9 (line 1420 of > /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk). > # > OKAY, this shows me at least that my new port is instalable after I > remove gnupg-1.4.8 > > # pkg_delete gnupg-1.4.8 > Can't remove gnupg-1.4.8 without also removing: > sylpheed-2.4.5p0-gpgme gpgme-1.1.5 enigmail-0.95.5p0 kdewebdev-3.5.8p0 > p5-GnuPG-Interface-0.31p0 p5-GnuPG-0.09p0 kdeaddons-3.5.8p0 > kdesdk-3.5.8p0 kdepim-3.5.8p0 py-gnupg-0.3.2p1 > # > OKAY, but I will not remove all those cherised software highly customized > at this moment, I want just to replace gnupg-1.4.8 with gnupg-1.4.9, I don't > care of dependencies issues as I am (hopelly) sure all those software > mentioned before in the warning are going to wrk OK with the newest version > of gnupg (hopelly, I will try anyway). > > I had already readen man pkg_delete and the -F options, but I cannot find a > clear option to "delete even knowing that you will break some other installed > software as it depend on this one". Once warned, i will delete it anyway, as > I hope that installing later the new port of gnupg-1.4.9 the dependencies > will be ok again, at least I will try ... Never mind, I am working on a > personal testing machine. > > So which one is the proper syntax for pkg_delete to "force deletion and dont > ask and don't verify dependencie issues"?
pkg_add(1) > As I said, the main reason to upgrade gnupg-1.4.8 (standard package at > OpenBSD 4.3 to gnupg-1.4.9 (not yet available as package, but as a port, > thanks to Reinhard J. Sammer, > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/security/gnupg ), Doing that you're mixing STABLE/RELEASE system with -current ports, this is not supported. http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#NoFun > is because of the recent discovery of a "moderately critical issue which can > potentially be exploited to compromise a vulnerable system" security issue > on gnupg-1.4.8 as per http://secunia.com/advisories/29568/ . > > > Thanks. > > macintoshzoom > > > On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:22:46 -0400 > Ian Darwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > macintoshzoom wrote: > > > Hi Federico, > > > There is not a package for updating gnupg, but a port from openports.se. > > > > This mailing list is for discussion of the OpenBSD ports system. > > OpenPorts.se is a front end to this; they don't maintain separate ports: > > > > "Since openports.se fetch its data from the [OpenBSD] Ports repository, > > there might exist nonworking URI's, outdated distfiles, et cetera. > > Needless to say, we can't do anything about these issues since the > > information is 'ports accurate', wherein the real problem is located..." > > > > The OpenBSD ports system *makes* packages. > > > > Packages are installed using pkg_add, as Federico mentioned. > > > > Please go and read the ports FAQ at http://openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html > > -- viq
pgpCR2pq3KdMp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
