Eric Faurot writes: > I just imported emacs22.
Why did you hurry with the import? The port still lacks the patches from emacs21 and has only been tested on a few platforms. > I called it emacs22, because there is no reason to change it to "emacs". > Some people will want emacs21, other emacs22. Who will maintain the emacs21 port? You? > The default package stays with the athena tk. I just added the gtk flavor, > and the no_x11 flavor remains, of course. Shouldn't the no_x11 port be built with the following options? --without-jpeg \ --without-tiff \ --without-gif \ --without-png Otherwise, LIB_DEPENDS-main should be set accordingly. > What emacs23 will be is not relevant. emacs-el stays a subpackage > because it is really heavy and mostly useless. I updated and attached the port that I sent to list this morning accordingly. I won't send a diff against emacs22 since I maintain a local port of Emacs 23 anyway and will focus on that port now. The updated port contains most of the patches from emacs21 adapted to Emacs 22 in case anyone is interested in incorporating these patches into the emacs22 port.
emacs22.tar.gz
Description: Updated port of Emacs 22
