On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 05:11:04PM -0400, Brad wrote: > On Tuesday 11 March 2008 16:57:20 Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > so, for the rest of the life of these ports, we will always have to tack > > on v0? > > > > seems (much) less than ideal. > > That makes no sense at all. It should be 1.12 -> 1.13 -> 1.12v0 -> 1.14. There is no way around it. You cannot have sensible rules that will work that way. Instead of suggesting version numbers, try figuring out a scheme that works, and lets you order softare sensibly. There is no other way. v* is for when you have a break in the numbering. You cannot go back, ever. It's simple, and it's not such a big deal.
