This passes regression tests ok now, thanks for fixing that. do_install in your Makefile is unused (it would actually be do-install i.e. s/_/-/, but the original distribution already has an install target which seems to be reasonably ok). Doesn't need to be there -> remove. :)
It's best to try and have things so 'make plist' produces an acceptable file; I would either rm the .orig in post-install or list in PLIST with @comment so re-running "make plist" doesn't re-include it. Also has the cat3f/man3f thing mentioned before. I need to go to another machine to actually try running it, maybe tomorrow (need to go there to test X fixes too). > # GPL > PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM= Yes > PERMIT_PACKAGE_FTP= Yes > PERMIT_DISTFILES_CDROM= No > PERMIT_DISTFILES_FTP= Yes PERMIT_DISTFILES_CDROM=No is pretty unusual for GPLv2 software, is there a reason why? If so it should be shown in a comment. If anyone is unsure about licensing/patents/etc, please point it out and ask, it's super-important to get this right. It doesn't apply here, but while I remember: for projects on sourceforge, double-check the copyright statements and license in files in the tarball, do not just go by the license marker on sf.net, sometimes these markers are *WRONG*. Someone committing it would fix these things first, but I think it helps to point them out rather than do them in the background so hopefully a few ports@ readers will pick up on the process. :-)
