On July 19, 2026 15:52:18 GMT+02:00, [email protected] wrote:
>============================= test session starts 
>==============================
>platform openbsd8 -- Python 3.14.6, pytest-9.0.3, pluggy-1.6.0 -- 
>/usr/local/bin/python3.14
>cachedir: .pytest_cache
>rootdir: /usr/ports/pobj/py-pika-1.4.1/pika-1.4.1
>configfile: pyproject.toml
>plugins: datafiles-3.0.1
>collecting ... collected 0 items
>
>=============================== warnings summary 
>===============================
>../../../../local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/_pytest/config/__init__.py:1581
>  /usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/_pytest/config/__init__.py:1581: 
> PytestConfigWarning: No files were found in testpaths; consider removing or 
> adjusting your testpaths configuration. Searching recursively from the 
> current directory instead.
>    self.args, self.args_source = self._decide_args(
>
>-- Docs: https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/how-to/capture-warnings.html
>============================== 1 warning in 0.75s 
>==============================
>*** Error 5 in . (/usr/ports/lang/python/3/python.port.mk:378 'do-test': @ rm 
>-rf "/usr/ports/pobj/py-pika-1.4.1/pytest-instroot";  /usr/por...)
>*** Error 2 in . (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:3108 
>'/usr/ports/pobj/py-pika-1.4.1/.test_done': @cd /usr/ports/devel/py-pika && 
>...)
>*** Error 2 in /usr/ports/devel/py-pika 
>(/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2722 'test': @lock=py3-pika-1.4.1;  
>export _LOCKS_HELD=" p...)
>--
>
># TRUSTED_PKG_PATH=/usr/ports/packages/amd64/all/ pkg_add -Dsnap -aa py3-pika
>py3-pika-1.4.1: ok
>--
>
>No spelling/grammmar or nits. Checks were fine.
>
>Maybe in devel/py-pika/Makefile add? :
>NO_TEST =      Yes
Seems so indeed lol

>// Rebuild with py3-pika
>$ cd /usr/ports/productivity/radicale && make clean=all clean && make build 
>package test ; make port-lib-depends-check check-shlib-syms
>
>No regression tests for radicale-3.7.5
>--
>
># TRUSTED_PKG_PATH=/usr/ports/packages/amd64/all/ pkg_add -Dsnap -Dinstalled 
>-r radicale 
>radicale-3.7.5: ok
>--
>
>That good or what was expected?
Yep, looks good to me

Reply via email to