Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2007/11/16 16:56, Aaron S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>     
>>> On 2007/11/15 14:07, Aaron S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Okan Demirmen wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> fyi, we've a minor formating fix on DESCR, but the larger issue is that
>>>>> pwman doesn't seem to work on at least macppc and possibly other big
>>>>> endian archs.
>>>>>
>>>>>   
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> Unfortunately, I don't have access to none of big endian machines.
>>>> Do we add this for now?
>>>> ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= amd64 i386
>>>>         
>
> In general we try to fix these if possible.
>
>   
>>> Well, there are more LE than these. I'm not sure whether they
>>> take too much care about alignment issues either, though, I didn't
>>> get time to test it much yet...
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> Is there anything else needed for it to be committed?
>>     
>
> Someone to look at macppc and try and fix it, a committer who
> thinks it's ready, another to ok it.
>
> On sparc64, it dumps core (unaligned memory access) if it can't
> find the gpg binary:
>
> (gdb) bt
> #0  vfscanf (fp=0xe73394da24fe62cb, fmt0=0x20cce0 "gpg (GnuPG) %d.%d.%d", 
>     ap=0xfffffffffffd4f70) at /usr/src/lib/libc/stdio/vfscanf.c:120
> #1  0x000000004ccd2104 in fscanf (fp=0xe73394da24fe62cb, 
>     fmt=0x20cce0 "gpg (GnuPG) %d.%d.%d") at 
> /usr/src/lib/libc/stdio/fscanf.c:44
> #2  0x000000000010a19c in gnupg_check_executable () at gnupg.c:339
> #3  0x000000000010a2bc in gnupg_write_many (doc=0x47486600, 
>     ids=0xfffffffffffd5478, num_ids=1, 
>     filename=0x47486200 "/home/sthen/.pwman.db") at gnupg.c:369
> #4  0x000000000010a25c in gnupg_write (doc=0x47486600, 
>     id=0x47486000 "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", 
>     filename=0x47486200 "/home/sthen/.pwman.db") at gnupg.c:356
> #5  0x0000000000103860 in pwlist_write_file () at pwlist.c:486
> #6  0x000000000010756c in pwman_quit () at pwman.c:140
> #7  0x00000000001075c4 in main (argc=0, argv=0xfffffffffffd5788) at 
> pwman.c:157
>
> but the main part of the app does seem to work there (just tried
> saving one password, so not an extensive test...).
>
> also I just spotted this;
>
> COMMENT=                console password manager based on gpgme
>
> the current version is based on gpg (they did switch to gpgme for 
> a while but switched back again).
>
>   
Fixed COMMENT,
- http://www.x96.org/pwman.tar.gz

Reply via email to