On 2026/01/06 14:32, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > It's more interesting to get openblas into the tree...
well, 2.2.6 is a blocker for Python 3.14, and that's likely to happen in tree sooner than openblas. Regarding openblas, you are free to do what you want on your own machine, but for getting it into the tree, nothing changed since my earlier comment: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=167387058503697&w=2 | The issue with OpenBLAS is that some things will pick it up in | preference to BLAS/LAPACK and it's going to need someone with an | interest in keeping the whole ports tree working (including on various | architectures) to do the work to cope. | | Just providing it as a library in ports without doing the rest of the | integration work causes more problems than it solves.
