On Sat Jan 03, 2026 at 10:41:45AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > > i'm all for adding the _seatd group, you could reuse stalwart-jmap/564 which > puts it next to _greetd, which seems 'logical'. end users shouldn't have to > fiddle with that (and with the default _seatd group for the > /var/run/seatd.sock > socket), and we should find a way to put the _greetd user in the _seatd group > automatically. >
I haven't done as many tests as Landry, but I vote for _seatd too.
