Le Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 08:43:56PM +0100, Kirill A. Korinsky a écrit :
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 20:23:07 +0100,
> Landry Breuil <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > This feels... wrong.
> > > > > 
> > > > > can't we somehow make it directly use the meson module with
> > > > > gtk/meson.build, instead of their homegrown horror of 
> > > > > make/configure.py ?
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > this homegrown horror creates GNUmakefile which compiles some 
> > > > dependencies,
> > > > and after it's done it calls meson and after that ninja.
> > > > 
> > > > Before it was autoconf and make, but they decided to migrate to meson.
> > > > 
> > > > Here a bit cleaner diff where I nuke autotools, and it survived a build 
> > > > in
> > > > clean chroot. And I also put comment which explains why meson/ninja 
> > > > here.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > ...and I forgot to add new patches. Here the right diff.
> > 
> > seems it switched to Gtk+4 :)
> > 
> > Run-time dependency gtk4 found: YES 4.20.2
> > 
> 
> Thanks to catch it. I've regenerated WANTLIBS and it seems quite shorter
> than it was before.

Yeah, thank meson for that.. anyway, i guess this is as good as it can
get with that funky configure system... runs fine here, ok.

Reply via email to