On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 19:43:21 +0100,
Kirill A. Korinsky <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> ports@,
> 
> a few months ago automake 1.18.1 was released:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2025-06/msg00007.html
> 
> I had briefly tested this, no regression.
> 
> Ok?
>

Anyone?

> 
> Index: Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/devel/automake/1.18/Makefile,v
> diff -u -p -r1.1.1.1 Makefile
> --- Makefile  7 Jul 2025 10:06:38 -0000       1.1.1.1
> +++ Makefile  31 Oct 2025 18:40:54 -0000
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>  VERSION=     1.18
> -DISTNAME=    automake-${VERSION}
> +DISTNAME=    automake-${VERSION}.1
>  PKGSPEC=     automake->=${VERSION},<1.19
>  EXTRACT_SUFX=        .tar.xz
>  PORTROACH=
> Index: distinfo
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/devel/automake/1.18/distinfo,v
> diff -u -p -r1.1.1.1 distinfo
> --- distinfo  7 Jul 2025 10:06:38 -0000       1.1.1.1
> +++ distinfo  31 Oct 2025 18:38:30 -0000
> @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
> -SHA256 (automake-1.18.tar.xz) = W9zMqWsAen40TCQgS5uawS7NF/WXGTGpBjve5Ih/Sq8=
> -SIZE (automake-1.18.tar.xz) = 1652364
> +SHA256 (automake-1.18.1.tar.xz) = 
> FoqjYyeDUbia9WaERI9SWlvOUHnQtoQr2RD90/FkaIc=
> +SIZE (automake-1.18.1.tar.xz) = 1652392
> Index: patches/patch-doc_automake_texi
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: 
> /home/cvs/ports/devel/automake/1.18/patches/patch-doc_automake_texi,v
> diff -u -p -r1.1.1.1 patch-doc_automake_texi
> --- patches/patch-doc_automake_texi   7 Jul 2025 10:06:38 -0000       1.1.1.1
> +++ patches/patch-doc_automake_texi   31 Oct 2025 18:38:40 -0000
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ Index: doc/automake.texi
>   @end direntry
>   
>   @titlepage
> -@@ -1600,15 +1601,15 @@ curious: the basic idea is to run:
> +@@ -1603,15 +1604,15 @@ curious: the basic idea is to run:
>   
>   @enumerate
>   @item @command{aclocal} (@pxref{aclocal Invocation}),
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ Index: doc/automake.texi
>   invoked at different points.  Thus, as you can see, using
>   @command{autoreconf} is quite a bit more convenient.
>   
> -@@ -8069,7 +8070,7 @@ AM_PATH_PYTHON([2.5])
> +@@ -8072,7 +8073,7 @@ AM_PATH_PYTHON([2.5])
>   
>   @noindent
>   This is fine when Python is an absolute requirement for the package.
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ Index: doc/automake.texi
>   @code{AM_PATH_PYTHON} could be called as follows.
>   
>   @example
> -@@ -9295,7 +9296,7 @@ let's proceed with an example.  Suppose our package co
> +@@ -9285,7 +9286,7 @@ let's proceed with an example.  Suppose our package co
>   for which we want to build a man page using @command{help2man}.  GNU
>   @command{help2man} produces simple manual pages from the
>   @option{--help} and @option{--version} output of other commands
> 
> 
> -- 
> wbr, Kirill
> 

-- 
wbr, Kirill

Reply via email to