On Sat, Sep 06, 2025 at 11:23:03AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2025/09/05 19:55, Brandon Mercer wrote: > > > 16 used only for mozillas on aarch64 > > > > Is it possible or benefitial to do the work to port the mozillas away > > from the llvm 16 dependency so we can do away with this "older" one? > > would be beneficial, I don't know whether it's possible.
The tracking bug is here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1973016 Chasing this down would be most welcome. > we could at least set 16 to ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=aarch64, which is built on > fadt machines anyway. It already is. > skipping over llvm 20 and going straight to 21 would generally seem > not a bad idea as far as the ports tree and bulk builds goes. Agreed.
