On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 14:01:06 +0200 Volker Schlecht <openbsd-po...@schlecht.dev> wrote:
> I personally don't see much of a point in any of these tools, but as > evidenced by neofetch, fastfetch et al, others seem to > > >Comment: > >shell ex-tendible fetching program > > I *think* it should be shell-extensible, but I'm not a native > speaker, so I won't get into a fight about it. > > >Description: > >Exfetch is a simple shell-extendible sysfetch thats: > > "that's", as already pointed out by someone else and "extensible" see > above. > > >- Extendible via shell scripting and flags > > See above. > > >- Lightweight and statically compilable > > $ ls -lah /usr/local/bin/*fetch > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root bin 1.8M Jun 19 13:31 /usr/local/bin/exfetch* > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root bin 1.8M Jun 17 09:43 /usr/local/bin/fastfetch* > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root bin 334K Jun 16 02:24 /usr/local/bin/neofetch* > > Compared to the other two fetches in OpenBSD ports, it's more on the > heavy end of the weight scale, or if you add bash to neofetch, they > are all in the same category. > > ok volker@ with a DESCR that's a little toned-down. > Here's a new port with these changes. I also updated it to 1.3.3, but they're mainly sanity changes in the build system to check for unsupported systems at build-time. The end-user behavior didn't change at all. Good to merge? -- iz (she/her) > i like to say mundane things, > there are too many uninteresting things > that go unnoticed. izder456 (dot) neocities (dot) org
exfetch-1.3.2.tgz
Description: application/compressed-tar
exfetch-1.3.2.tgz
Description: application/compressed-tar
