I wrote on Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 12:15:36AM +0200:
> Mikolaj Kucharski wrote on Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 02:27:25AM +0100:
>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 02:28:55AM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>>> -PKGNAME= ${DISTNAME}p0
>>> +PKGNAME= ${DISTNAME}p0u0
>> First time I see that kind of patchlevel. Why you used that?
> You are right, after reading OpenBSD::PackageName i now see that
> naming is non-standard and doesn't work out well. What i meant
> to say was "This is based on mutt-1.5.16p0, containing additional
> user patches of version 0".
>
> The standard syntax for that is
> PKGNAME= ${DISTNAME}p0v0
Please disregard, this is very wrong. See
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=119109303221229
On the other hand, my explanation still holds
why ${DISTNAME}p0u0 does not quite work as intended, either.
Sorry for the confusion,
Ingo
