On Thu, 01 May 2025 12:54:21 +0200, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote: > > Good find. > > Seeing https://github.com/ThirVondukr/passlib/pull/15#issuecomment-2844561564 > do you think it might be worth waiting to see what gets committed > upstream first? >
Here a diff which updates security/py-passlib to 1.9.1 Tested against mitmproxy 11.1.3 and 12.0.0, it fixes the issue. Ok for -current? Also, when I read https://github.com/ThirVondukr/passlib/compare/1.9.0...1.9.1 I don't see any notable changes except some refactoring to follow ruff rules. I can extract logger part as patched to 1.9.0 for -stable, or we may update -stable into 1.9.1. Index: security/py-passlib/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/security/py-passlib/Makefile,v diff -u -p -r1.30 Makefile --- security/py-passlib/Makefile 26 Mar 2025 09:42:19 -0000 1.30 +++ security/py-passlib/Makefile 2 May 2025 14:53:06 -0000 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ COMMENT= Python module providing a password hashing framework -MODPY_DISTV= 1.9.0 +MODPY_DISTV= 1.9.1 DISTNAME= libpass-${MODPY_DISTV} # libpass is a maintained fork of passlib, providing the same namespace PKGNAME= py-passlib-${MODPY_DISTV} Index: security/py-passlib/distinfo =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/security/py-passlib/distinfo,v diff -u -p -r1.8 distinfo --- security/py-passlib/distinfo 26 Mar 2025 09:42:19 -0000 1.8 +++ security/py-passlib/distinfo 2 May 2025 14:54:08 -0000 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -SHA256 (libpass-1.9.0.tar.gz) = wdw89KuA0mNLlgn1fDFlwOpMrPSVmq8PPgau+ld7A6w= -SIZE (libpass-1.9.0.tar.gz) = 688858 +SHA256 (libpass-1.9.1.tar.gz) = 9alUT4DL6ZUjszYvsfwrpBGxDFQWiFJsP97qAFQdJ9A= +SIZE (libpass-1.9.1.tar.gz) = 670876 -- wbr, Kirill
