On 2025/03/27 10:52, Raf Czlonka wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 10:34:02AM GMT, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2025/03/26 17:04, Raf Czlonka wrote: > > > Also, there's at least one more dependency which isn't met: > > > > > > pyzmq>=25.1.2 ; python_version < '3.13' > > > pyzmq>=26.2.0 ; python_version >= '3.13' > > > > > > [0] https://github.com/saltstack/salt/blob/master/requirements/zeromq.txt > > > > Seems optional, only needed for some use cases? > > Nope, this is an actual runtime dependency[0]:
thanks, py-zmq updated to 25.1.2. (26.x will be trickier as it needs scikit-build-core which we don't have and IIRC is a pain). > > On 2025/03/27 09:45, Raf Czlonka wrote: > > > As Tommy already mentioned, there's "onedir" option, which would > > > probably solve most of the headaches, no? > > > > Seems it downloads and builds Python? That looks like a much bigger > > headache as far as ports is concerned. > > Can't say how much of a bigger headache that is from building the > port itself but, at least runtime-wise, it stays out of the way and > does not interfere with system Python. Probably enough of a headache that if it's a hard requirement it would likely make more sense to drop salt from ports.
