On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 10:26:00PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2025/03/26 15:45, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:58:25 +0100,
> > Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > 1. Anubis is normally configured via environment variables (it is
> > > normally meant for running in Docker and this seems fairly common,
> > > albeit annoying). This can be done via login.conf "setenv", but one
> > > of the required parameters is a URL. It is _possible_ to escape
> > > URL-standard characters for setenv, but the syntax is barely
> > > documented and pretty horrible, so I am sourcing a shell script
> > > /etc/anubis.env instead.
> > >
> > 
> > Right now we have security/vaultwarden, productivity/monica and net/librenms
> > which uses .env file as a way to be configured.
> > 
> > Not sure that the right way, but I think that /etc/anubis.env is cleaner
> > than /var/vaultwarden/.env
> 
> No idea about how vaultwarden works (looks like a pkg-readme might not
> be a bad idea), but for librenms/monica there is no specific daemon and
> this is just a config file used by the symfony PHP framework and I think
> things are ok as they are now.
> 

Vaultwarden is pretty much the same as anubis. The environment file
serves as a config file. In the Linux deployements I manage, we put it
in /etc/vaultwarden.conf (and point the systemd EnvironmentFile
variable to it).

Having it under /var on .Ox looks a bit weird to my eyes, but I will
not cry if anubis also uses LOCALSTATEDIR for consistency with
vaulwarden in case it's too late to move vaultwarden's default.

-- 
Matthieu Herrb

Reply via email to