> I didn't look much at the openrdap.org client before (go is a bit > of a turn-off ports-wise), but now I've tried it, actually I like it the > best of the three - cleaner output than both rdapper/icann-rdap, under > a minute to build, and doesn't pull in 80+ p5-* deps. I'll attach a > first cut at a port for that too.
It definitely is the one I like best, too. Although it only adds two mostly dead archs to the ones icann-rdap supports :) I have no real opinion on the naming of ports and binaries but I'm ok with importing this go port with whichever consensus emerges. > +# ring-v0.17.8 does not support this arch > +NOT_FOR_ARCHS = sparc64 I think we should not mention the patch version in these comments. ring v0.17 won't grow sparc64 support.
