On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 03:40:58PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > On Sat, Jan 04, 2025 at 06:08:20PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > > > During the last hackathon in Valencia I did not check whether gdb-13.2 > > was the latest available; actually gdb-15.2 was already available > > upstream. Since some remaining warts are now fixed, hopefully this > > update should be more straightforward. There's not much to say > > besides that mpfr is now required. Also the gdb 16 branch has been > > created upstream recently. > > > > Successfully tested by Pascal and I on: arm64 (w/PAC) armv7 amd64 i386 > > powerpc mips64 riscv64 sparc64. Among the recently tested archs, that > > leaves powerpc64. > > > > Test reports on powerpc64 would be much appreciated. > > I understand that it's difficult to test powerpc64 since exceptions > are apparently broken by xonly on that arch. While I dislike leaving > out another arch, I'm tempted to ignore gdb native status on powerpc64 > for this update. > > > Test reports on > > any arch and oks welcome too. > > I can see inferior processes *sometimes* broken with SIGILL on > OpenBSD/arm, which I missed during the update to gdb-13. But the > problem was already present with gdb-9, so I won't consider this a > blocker for this update to gdb-15.2, and instead I'll send a report as > time permits. > > I got no feedback so far on this gdb-15.2 update, besides the test > reports from Pascal. Input & oks still welcome.
It works for me well enough for me in the few simple cases I needed it in the last week (amd64 and arm64), but I didn't have to use gdb to debug anything serious since I built and installed it last saturday. I'd say go ahead. ok tb
