On Wed, 7 Aug 2024, Christian Weisgerber wrote:

> I gave it a shot and tried an amd64 bulk build with LLVM 18.
> 
> The good news is that there were only four build failures.  The bad
> news is that the cython one prevented the interesting 1/3 of the
> tree from any attempt at building.
> 

Any difference with the cython update below? Or same result?

Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/cython/Makefile,v
diff -u -p -u -r1.67 Makefile
--- Makefile    13 Jul 2024 13:51:10 -0000      1.67
+++ Makefile    7 Aug 2024 23:29:35 -0000
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 COMMENT =              optimising static compiler for Python and Cython
 
-MODPY_EGG_VERSION =    3.0.10
-DISTNAME =             Cython-${MODPY_EGG_VERSION}
+MODPY_EGG_VERSION =    3.0.11
+DISTNAME =             cython-${MODPY_EGG_VERSION}
 PKGNAME =              py-cython-${MODPY_EGG_VERSION}
 CATEGORIES =           lang
 
Index: distinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/cython/distinfo,v
diff -u -p -u -r1.39 distinfo
--- distinfo    13 Jul 2024 13:51:10 -0000      1.39
+++ distinfo    7 Aug 2024 23:29:35 -0000
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-SHA256 (Cython-3.0.10.tar.gz) = 3MlnOTMfuFTc9QP5RgdXbP6EiAZsYcpQ39VYNvEy3pk=
-SIZE (Cython-3.0.10.tar.gz) = 2751764
+SHA256 (cython-3.0.11.tar.gz) = cUbdKvhoK0ymEzGFHmrrzp/lFY51MAND+AwHyoCx+v8=
+SIZE (cython-3.0.11.tar.gz) = 2755544

Reply via email to