On 2024/08/01 02:23:55 +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso <stef...@sdaoden.eu> wrote:
> Hello people.
> 
> Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
>  <20240709230300.JzTlLnsW@steffen%sdaoden.eu>:
>  |Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
>  | <20240601194022.KVrLXlqQ@steffen%sdaoden.eu>:
>  ||Now with this "--client IP/CIDR" works as desired.
>  ||I also cleaned up the makefile, it had cruft from s-postgray.
>  ||Works nicely, configuration is different to other well-known DKIM
>  ||implementations, though.
>  |
>  |Anyone to commit this?  It is, i think, a good one.
> 
> It would be really nice if someone would wave this through.
> Thank you.

Please send tarball for new ports in the future.

The port looks fine to me, I only think we have to remove the COMPILER
lines since this don't need one (it's build with -std=c99 so it should
work also with "our" gcc 4.x.)

--- Makefile.orig       Thu Aug  1 09:56:07 2024
+++ Makefile    Thu Aug  1 10:00:25 2024
@@ -11,9 +11,6 @@
 # ISC
 PERMIT_PACKAGE=                Yes
 
-COMPILER=              base-clang ports-gcc
-COMPILER_LANGS=                c
-
 WANTLIB+=              c crypto
 
 MAKE_FILE=             makefile


I haven't tested it at runtime, but I'm reattaching a tarball with this
change that's ok op@ to import.


Thank you,

Omar Polo

Attachment: s-dkim-sign.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Reply via email to