Hello there, I have been developing some software[1] (effectively a hack) that leverages the OpenBSD packages and creates standalone self contained prefixes / "bundles". Particularly useful for behemoths such as Firefox, Chromium, etc. In terms of updates, these guys drag in so much cruft, I kind of just prefer to blow them away and start from scratch anyway with a new i.e: /opt/chromium122
Through many of my cludges (mainly environment variables avoiding hard coded /usr/local paths but also some binary patching of rpaths[2]), I notice that a few libraries (and executables) built by ports have absolute rpaths. But this is rare suggesting it isn't really intended to be the norm. Is this something that should be reported to the respective port maintainer? Examples are (objdump -x [...] | grep NEEDED): libtiff.so.42.0 (from the tiff package). /usr/local/lib/libzstd.so.6.3 xpdf (from the xpdf package (not xpdf3)) /usr/local/lib/qt5/./libQt5Network.so.4.0 /usr/local/lib/qt5/./libQt5PrintSupport.so.3.0 /usr/local/lib/qt5/./libQt5Widgets.so.4.1 /usr/local/lib/qt5/./libQt5Gui.so.4.2 /usr/local/lib/qt5/./libQt5Core.so.6.0 Many thanks, Karsten [1] https://codeberg.org/kpedersen/pkg_bundle [2] https://codeberg.org/kpedersen/pkg_bundle/src/branch/master/share/pkg_bundle/clean-rpath.c
