On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 10:28:25AM +0200, Tobias Heider wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 05:02:28AM +0200, Lorenz (xha) wrote: > > haven't thought about the two getting out of sync, nothing would > > work after that! i like your patch. although i think that harec > > should keep being a runtime dependency. the `hare` binary is just > > a build driver after all. > > Isn't harec only used during the bootstrapping step? I thought after > that is is all hare and qbe
lol that be cool, but right now hare is not self-hosted, harec is the only comforming implementation :)
