On 8/8/07, Peter Thoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hate to call Rui out in public but he is the maintainer here and very
> non responsive to private emails about this.
>
> Tor 1.1.x has BEEN DEPRECIATED from before the time 4.1 STABLE was
> released (you were notified of this also Rui) and all version earlier

Can you share where you are getting this from?

http://tor.eff.org/download.html.en
"The latest stable release is 0.1.2.16, and the latest development
release is 0.2.0.4-alpha."

We normally follow -stable ports and not alpha code snapshots from
projects' development branches so I am afraid I see nothing improper
here!

Additionally:
2007-08-01: Tor 0.2.0.4-alpha fixes a critical security vulnerability
for most users, specifically those running Vidalia, TorK, etc.
Everybody should upgrade.
2007-08-01: Tor 0.1.2.16 fixes a critical security vulnerability for
most users, specifically those running Vidalia, TorK, etc. Everybody
should upgrade.

I'm sorry but the bug affected BOTH stable AND the snapshot so you are
on drugs that it would have helped. And you are an asshole for calling
out Rui in the manner that you did!

> than 1.2.15 suffer a remote code exploitation which has been proven in
> the wild already with technical details to be released to the public in
> two week per the developers.  The developers announced all users should
> update immediately yet still not seeing this port updated in stable when

The port has been updated in -current immediately after this happened
and this is where development happens. This is a volunteer project and
-stable is not with priority.

Reply via email to