On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 01:09:51 +0100, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote: > > - there's a proper distfile so please use that instead of github: > https://downloads.mitmproxy.org/10.3.0/mitmproxy-10.3.0.tar.gz
Swithced, but this distfile hasn't got tests but I assume it's ok. > On 2024/06/11 00:03, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > > ports@, > > > > Here a new port security/py-mitmproxy and security/py-mitmproxy_rs which I'd > > like to send as one part because this two ports are logically linked > > together and the last one is useless without the first one. > > btw, I think generally it would have be helpful to include the set of > dependencies with the main port too; splitting across half a dozen or so > emails makes it harder to keep track of them all, and someone testing > this will need to look at the others. > noted, this one required: www/py-asgiref www/py-aioquic archivers/py-lsqpack devel/py-kaitaistruct net/py-publicsuffix2 www/py-h2 www/py-hpack www/py-hyperframe security/py-service_identity net/synapse devel/py-test-forked archivers/py-zstandard archivers/py-brotlicffi > I'll try to look at the others but din't have all that much time atm. > thanks! An updated archive with addressed remarks is attached. -- wbr, Kirill
mitmproxy.tgz
Description: Binary data
