On Mon May 20, 2024 at 02:45:15AM GMT, Viacheslav Chimishuk wrote:
> When I try to build cmake-based application which uses sdl2-image it fails
> because of missing /usr/local/lib/libSDL2_image.so file.
> 
> Cmake files provided by sdl2-image are looking for
> /usr/local/lib/libSDL2_image.so, which is obviously not found. I can see that
> sdl2-image port misses some files which we have for other sdl2-* ports. For
> example for devel/sdl2-ttf.
> 
> So, proposed patch fixes cmake files to look for
> /usr/local/lib/libSDL2_image.so.1.1 instead of /usr/local/lib/libSDL2_image.so

Looks good. port bumped missed otherwise OK rsadowski

> 
> diff --git a/devel/sdl2-image/Makefile b/devel/sdl2-image/Makefile
> index 3ab8314ca..27ee3c0d3 100644
> --- a/devel/sdl2-image/Makefile
> +++ b/devel/sdl2-image/Makefile
> @@ -39,4 +39,7 @@ CONFIGURE_ARGS +=   --disable-avif-shared \
>                       --disable-webp-shared
>  CONFIGURE_ENV +=     OBJC="${CC}"
> 
> +pre-configure:
> +     ${SUBST_CMD} ${WRKSRC}/sdl2_image-config.cmake.in
> +
>  .include <bsd.port.mk>
> diff --git a/devel/sdl2-image/patches/patch-sdl2_image-config_cmake_in 
> b/devel/sdl2-image/patches/patch-sdl2_image-config_cmake_in
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..c4bf5c9ac
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/devel/sdl2-image/patches/patch-sdl2_image-config_cmake_in
> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> +Index: sdl2_image-config.cmake.in
> +--- sdl2_image-config.cmake.in.orig
> ++++ sdl2_image-config.cmake.in
> +@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ if(NOT TARGET SDL2_image::SDL2_image)
> +     else()
> +         set_target_properties(SDL2_image::SDL2_image
> +             PROPERTIES
> +-                IMPORTED_LOCATION 
> "${_sdl2image_libdir}/${CMAKE_SHARED_LIBRARY_PREFIX}SDL2_image${CMAKE_SHARED_LIBRARY_SUFFIX}"
> ++                IMPORTED_LOCATION 
> "${_sdl2image_libdir}/${CMAKE_SHARED_LIBRARY_PREFIX}SDL2_image${CMAKE_SHARED_LIBRARY_SUFFIX}.${LIBSDL2_image_VERSION}"
> +         )
> +     endif()
> + endif()
> 
> --
> Best regards, Viacheslav Chimishuk
> vchimis...@yandex.ru
> Ukraine, Khmelnitsky
> 

Reply via email to