2024-05-05T23:53:00Z "James Cook" <falsif...@falsifian.org>: > A bit more info: > > I get the same result on my laptop. (The bug I mentioned in my > previous email was a broken version of dwz; pkg_add -u dwz fixed > it.)
Thanks for looking into this James, I think I've found the issue. If you look at line 539 of the test.log file I sent, you'll see the following: gmake[2]: Entering directory '/usr/ports/pobj/vis-0.9/vis-0.9/test/sam' sam(1) not found, skipping tests On yours: gmake[2]: Entering directory '/home/pobj/vis-0.9/vis-0.9/test/sam' /usr/local/plan9/bin/sam So it seems that because you've installed the plan9/plan9port (I assume) which includes a binary for sam, it runs the tests for sam. I don't have it which makes it skip them. Running the tests with sam installed yields the same test failures for me (Tests ok 22/26). I also tried using the plan9/sam port instead and even less tests are passed (Tests ok 20/26). The question here is: Should plan9/sam (not plan9/plan9port as it is much larger) be added as a test dependency? kn@ what's your opinion on this?
