On Mon Apr 15, 2024 at 12:07:34PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > Le Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 07:33:15AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski a écrit : > > On Sat Apr 06, 2024 at 02:36:43PM +0000, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > > 14.03.2024 23:42, Rafael Sadowski via ports пишет: > > > > I would like to import multimedia/phonon-backend/vlc-qt6 > > > > multimedia/phonon-qt6. Please find tarball attached. This import does > > > > not create any conflicts but it needs a simple adjustment > > > > > > Why those LIB_DEPENDS those? > > > No REVISION bumps? > > > > > > > Nothing changes: I moved LIB_DEPENDS as it is from Makefile.inc to the > > Makefile's. This change is necessary to import > > multimedia/phonon-backend/vlc-qt6 otherwise > > multimedia/phonon-backend/vlc-qt6 depends on "multimedia/phonon>=4.12.0" > > which is qt5. > > that part is fine. I looked at the two ports, and it's still a bit sad > to have 'new ports with a -qt6 suffix' from the same tarball building > twice, once with qt5 and once with qt6, while it could only be built > once with the two qt5/qt6 backends and shipped as subpackages.. that > would be cleaner. Will that be only transitional, or both will coexist > for years ?
I think this depends on how long we want ship editors/calligra and how long the marble (x11/kde-applications/marble) needs to move to Qt6/KF6. > > anybody else having a strong opinion on that subject ? To be honest, I tried it with a flavor. Look at the mails on ports@. I never got a clean status and at some point it's not worth the time.
