Le Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 07:38:35PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski a écrit : > On Sun Apr 14, 2024 at 06:52:42PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > > Le Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 07:25:49AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski a écrit : > > > The same pattern like in the perverse qt6 flavor diffs. OK? > > > > my understanding is that is needed for the huge devel/kf6 monster: > > in devel/kf6/purpose: the following libraries in WANTLIB look like masked > > by RUN_DEPENDS: Qt6Core Qt6DBus Qt6Gui Qt6Network Qt6Qml Qt6Widgets Qt6Xml > > accounts-qt6 kaccounts6 > > Hmm, I think this is an issue on your side (My bulk was happy and my > current local build is happy)
i have no idea about that, it was on a clean portstree with only your devel/kf6 tarball. > There are some more commits in nicolasfella libaccounts-qt6 repo so I > bumped the libaccounts-qt (qt5) version. what i meant was that this was not "the same code" so something else than REVISION and SHARED_LIBS should be bumped, hence maybe pl0 :) > > do the 3 consumers need adaptations or just build fine with this update ? > > i don't remember if a REVISION bump is needed since you add a flavor, maybe > > the > > pkgpath changes ? > > > > x11/kde-applications/kio-gdrive > > x11/kde-applications/akonadi > > x11/kde-applications/kaccounts-integration > > Yes they do. I don't know yet whether I'll do this before the > kde6-big-bang commit. If so, I'll test it with the current tree and the > ports. if they build then ok with me, with pl0 Landry
