On Friday, March 22, 2024 08:40 CET, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote:
> On 2024/03/21 23:11, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > > Hi, > > > > found that pkg_info -I supports %branch notation, in contrast to -Q: > > root@galen:/tmp# pkg_info -Q postfix%stable35 > > Can't locate object method "match" via package > > "OpenBSD::Search::FilterLocation" at /usr/libdata/perl5/OpenBSD/Search.pm > > line 25. > > root@galen:/tmp# pkg_info -Q postfix%snapshot > > Can't locate object method "match" via package > > "OpenBSD::Search::FilterLocation" at /usr/libdata/perl5/OpenBSD/Search.pm > > line 25. > > root@galen:/tmp# pkg_info -I postfix%snapshot > > postfix-3.8.6v0-ldap fast, secure sendmail replacement > > The snapshot dir of Postfix was removed, there's now just stable35 > (the last version that can be built with libressl) and stable. > > > root@galen:/tmp# pkg_info -I postfix%stable35 > > postfix-3.5.25 fast, secure sendmail replacement > > postfix-3.5.25-ldap fast, secure sendmail replacement > > postfix-3.5.25-mysql fast, secure sendmail replacement > > postfix-3.5.25-pgsql fast, secure sendmail replacement > > postfix-3.5.25-sasl2 fast, secure sendmail replacement > > postfix-3.5.25-sasl2-ldap fast, secure sendmail replacement > > postfix-3.5.25-sasl2-mysql fast, secure sendmail replacement > > postfix-3.5.25-sasl2-pgsql fast, secure sendmail replacement > > root@galen:/tmp# pkg_info -I postfix > > postfix-3.8.6v0-ldap fast, secure sendmail replacement > > root@galen:/tmp# pkg_info -Q postfix > > postfix-3.5.25 > > postfix-3.5.25-ldap > > postfix-3.5.25-mysql > > postfix-3.5.25-pgsql > > postfix-3.5.25-sasl2 > > postfix-3.5.25-sasl2-ldap > > postfix-3.5.25-sasl2-mysql > > postfix-3.5.25-sasl2-pgsql > > postfix-3.8.6v0 > > postfix-3.8.6v0-ldap (installed) > > postfix-3.8.6v0-mysql > > postfix-3.8.6v0-pgsql > > postfix-3.8.6v0-sasl2 > > postfix-3.8.6v0-sasl2-ldap > > postfix-3.8.6v0-sasl2-mysql > > postfix-3.8.6v0-sasl2-pgsql > > postfix-policyd-spf-perl-2.011 > > > > however, as the example shows, when a package of a branch supporting > > flavors is installed, using -I pkgname%branch only the installed package is > > returned, as compared checking for a branch that is not installed, then all > > flavors are listed. > > My expectation rather for the installed branch would be to also list all > > available packages, no? > > There are probably valid use cases for both. Note, you can do this: > > $ pkg_info -I postfix%stable > postfix-3.8.6v0 fast, secure sendmail replacement > $ PKG_DBDIR=/var/empty pkg_info -I postfix%stable > postfix-3.8.6v0 fast, secure sendmail replacement > postfix-3.8.6v0-ldap fast, secure sendmail replacement > postfix-3.8.6v0-mysql fast, secure sendmail replacement > postfix-3.8.6v0-pgsql fast, secure sendmail replacement > postfix-3.8.6v0-sasl2 fast, secure sendmail replacement > postfix-3.8.6v0-sasl2-ldap fast, secure sendmail replacement > postfix-3.8.6v0-sasl2-mysql fast, secure sendmail replacement > postfix-3.8.6v0-sasl2-pgsql fast, secure sendmail replacement > > > Or would it rather make sense to have pkg_add -Q support %branch notation? > > That would probably be handy. > > > Second topic: pkg_add postfix%snapshot works well, but can't this way to > > force to install a given flavor: > > You're hitting some default-case handling by using %snapshot because > that ports subdir no longer exists. > > > pkg_add postfix%snapshot--ldap > > So can't easily install a flavor of a given branch in one command, or am I > > missing something? > > postfix--ldap%stable > This is all helpful, have to check that out. thank you, Sebastian
