On 2007/07/25 11:17, Todd T. Fries wrote: > You only loose mail if you muck with compressed files. If the 2nd MUA had > the ability to muck with compressed files, it would face similar delimas as > mutt does. The only other MUA I'm aware of that accesses compressed mbox > files is dovecot, which has a plugin not enabled by default that only > permits reading but not writing to compressed mbox files. > > In any event, if the warning is added to the Muttrc where those lines are > added, would that be sufficient?
ah, thanks for explaining (you can tell I don't use compressed folders in Mutt :-) yes on that count then. Having read steven's post, I think he has a valid point though. How about rolling the two FLAVORs into 'with_patches' if it's desirable to reduce the number of FLAVORs?
