Hi,
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 10:51:33AM +0100, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> Just wondered, should @exec-add be executed with `-r' flag to pkg_add
> added as @exec-delete wasn't in example below executed? Please see
> attached patch for plist changes.
>
>
> # env PKG_PATH=.../i386/all/ pkg_add -ri -F installed dbus
> New package dbus-1.0.2p1 contains potentially unsafe operations
> @exec-add /usr/local/bin/dbus-uuidgen --ensure
> proceed with update anyways? [y/N/a] a
> Old package dbus-1.0.2p1 contains potentially unsafe operations
> @unexec rm -f /var/run/dbus/*
> dbus-1.0.2p1 (extracting): complete
> dbus-1.0.2p1 (deleting): complete
> dbus-1.0.2p1 (installing): complete
> Clean shared items: complete
> --- dbus-1.0.2p1 -------------------
> You should remove all dbus related lines from /etc/rc.local,
> [...]
Could someone kind comment on my question in subject?
--
best regards
q#
Index: pkg/PLIST
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/dbus/pkg/PLIST,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.3 PLIST
--- pkg/PLIST 21 Mar 2007 00:21:58 -0000 1.3
+++ pkg/PLIST 5 Jul 2007 09:42:14 -0000
@@ -55,5 +55,6 @@
@owner _dbus
@group _dbus
@sample /var/run/dbus/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ${PREFIX}/bin/dbus-uuidgen --ensure
@unexec rm -f /var/run/dbus/*
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ${PREFIX}/bin/dbus-uuidgen --ensure
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rm -f ${SYSCONFDIR}/dbus-1/machine-id
