On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 08:54:56PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> I was surprised that MODCLANG_VERSION still defaulted to 13, so I ran a
> bulk with MODCLANG_VERSION ?= 16 in clang.port.mk to see what breaks.
> Looks like we are mostly ready to switch. Not sure if some things will
> need bumps and/or PLISTs need to be regenerated.
The diff below went through several bulks with no fallout before and
after the libc crank. Any objections? Additional things that need to be
done?
Index: lang/clang/clang.port.mk
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/clang/clang.port.mk,v
diff -u -p -r1.41 clang.port.mk
--- lang/clang/clang.port.mk 16 Nov 2023 11:32:34 -0000 1.41
+++ lang/clang/clang.port.mk 4 Dec 2023 18:18:43 -0000
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-MODCLANG_VERSION ?= 13
+MODCLANG_VERSION ?= 16
MODCLANG_RUN_DEPENDS= devel/llvm/${MODCLANG_VERSION}
MODCLANG_LIB_DEPENDS= devel/llvm/${MODCLANG_VERSION}
