On 2023/11/13 15:54:15 +0100, Marc Espie <marc.espie.open...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 02:08:32PM +0100, Omar Polo wrote: > > On 2023/11/13 13:49:03 +0100, Stefan Hagen <sh+openbsd-po...@codevoid.de> > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > DIST_TUPLE did not yet make it into the Makefile.template. > > > > > > OK to add it under the GH_ parts? > > > > why not replacing GH_* completely with this in the template? There is > > still stuff that explicitly depends on GH_*? (except go.port.mk) > > There are cases where the conversion from GH_* to DIST_TUPLE is > non trivial for various reasons.
Agreed, but I was referring explicitly to the Makefile.template, as in a suggestion for newer ports, not necessarly to start converting existing ports. Or I'm missing some interaction between GH_* and other parts of bsd.port.mk (or modules -- except go.port.mk tha I know looks at GH_*) where using GH_* plays a particular role?
