On 2023/10/27 10:50, j...@bitminer.ca wrote: > Looking at rspamd, the Makefile indicates a need for BLAS and CBLAS > but the resulting executables do not reference them. > > It turns out absent a specific CONFIGURE_ARGS+= -DENABLE_BLAS=ON > then the build substitutes a simple pair of codes from kann, instead > of using BLAS. (The needed codes are saxpy and sgemm.) > > Is it time to remove the blas references from rspamd?
Ah yes, this was disabled by default in an older rspamd release. I will include something along these lines when I commit the 3.7.3 update. (btw, please make sure port maintainers are CC'd if you're sending a mail about a maintained port rather than relying on them seeing your message on ports@).
