On 2023/09/18 11:07, Omar Polo wrote:
> Don't know whether we're too late for a boost update or not

It's a bit late for a boost update before 7.4, I don't think we
can get enough testing on multi archs in time.

> Here's an updated diff that sets USE_NOBTCFI and avoids statically
> linking to some of the deps (missed this in previous attempt.)

I'm fine with that approach. (haven't tested the diff though)

> it uses c++ to build a sub-library (basis-universal) and to link, I
> guess that's why c++ ends up in the wantlibs but doesn't link to
> c++abi nor pthread...  Here's why i'm not using COMPILER_LIBCXX in
> WANTLIBs.  any clue?

no idea about that. since it sets ONLY_FOR_ARCHS to a subset of
base-clang archs anyway that won't cause a problem with WANTLIB,
at least.

Reply via email to