On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 12:45:05PM -0700, Greg Steuck wrote:
> Looks like we no longer have to manage a namespace of just 10 entries
> globally in the ports tree :)
> 
> OK?
> 
> >From 9f430fa6addbc4b89e260d5d7aa5cb43b8943b9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Greg Steuck <g...@nest.cx>
> Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 12:41:33 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] Switch from MASTER_SITES to MASTER_SITES.hs in Haskell ports
> 
> ---
>  devel/cabal-install/Makefile |  6 +++---
>  devel/cabal/cabal.port.mk    | 15 ++++++---------
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/devel/cabal-install/Makefile b/devel/cabal-install/Makefile
> index 26b784af857..607e49060f7 100644
> --- a/devel/cabal-install/Makefile
> +++ b/devel/cabal-install/Makefile
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ RUN_DEPENDS =               lang/ghc
>  EXTRACT_ONLY =               ${DISTNAME}.tar.gz
>  DISTFILES =          ${EXTRACT_ONLY}
>  DIST_SUBDIR =                hackage
> -MASTER_SITES0 =              https://hackage.haskell.org/package/
> +MASTER_SITES.hs =    https://hackage.haskell.org/package/
>  
>  # Produced by manually copying values out of files/openbsd.json.
>  _MANIFEST = \
> @@ -64,8 +64,8 @@ _MANIFEST = \
>       zlib    0.6.3.0 1
>  
>  .for _package _version _revision in ${_MANIFEST}
> -DISTFILES += {${_package}-${_version}/}${_package}-${_version}.tar.gz:0
> -DISTFILES += 
> ${_package}-${_version}_${_revision}{${_package}-${_version}/revision/${_revision}}.cabal:0
> +DISTFILES.hs += {${_package}-${_version}/}${_package}-${_version}.tar.gz
> +DISTFILES.hs += 
> ${_package}-${_version}_${_revision}{${_package}-${_version}/revision/${_revision}}.cabal
>  .endfor
>  
>  BUILD_DEPENDS +=     lang/ghc>=8.10.6
> diff --git a/devel/cabal/cabal.port.mk b/devel/cabal/cabal.port.mk
> index ac8a419315f..539f0473c5a 100644
> --- a/devel/cabal/cabal.port.mk
> +++ b/devel/cabal/cabal.port.mk
> @@ -35,10 +35,7 @@ ONLY_FOR_ARCHS ?=  i386 amd64
>  BUILD_DEPENDS +=     devel/cabal-install>=3.4.0.0 \
>                       lang/ghc>=8.6.4
>  
> -# Takes over :9 site for hackage. The day when we have a port using
> -# both Go/Rust and Hackage we'll have to resolve their common
> -# insistance on grabbing :9.
> -MASTER_SITES9 =              https://hackage.haskell.org/package/
> +MASTER_SITES.hs =    https://hackage.haskell.org/package/
>  
>  DIST_SUBDIR ?=               hackage
>  
> @@ -47,8 +44,8 @@ DIST_SUBDIR ?=              hackage
>  EXTRACT_CASES += *.cabal) ;;
>  
>  DISTNAME ?=          ${MODCABAL_STEM}-${MODCABAL_VERSION}
> -HOMEPAGE ?=          ${MASTER_SITES9}${MODCABAL_STEM}
> -MASTER_SITES ?=              ${MASTER_SITES9}${DISTNAME}/
> +HOMEPAGE ?=          ${MASTER_SITES.hs}${MODCABAL_STEM}
> +MASTER_SITES ?=              ${MASTER_SITES.hs}${DISTNAME}/
>  DISTFILES ?=         ${DISTNAME}.tar.gz
>  SUBST_VARS +=                MODCABAL_STEM MODCABAL_VERSION PKGNAME
>  
> @@ -63,7 +60,7 @@ MODCABAL_post-extract = \
>  # Some packages need an updated .cabal file from hackage to overwrite
>  # the one in the tar ball.
>  .if defined(MODCABAL_REVISION)
> -DISTFILES += 
> ${DISTNAME}_${MODCABAL_REVISION}{revision/${MODCABAL_REVISION}}.cabal
> +DISTFILES.hs += 
> ${DISTNAME}_${MODCABAL_REVISION}{revision/${MODCABAL_REVISION}}.cabal
>  MODCABAL_post-extract += \
>       && cp ${FULLDISTDIR}/${DISTNAME}_${MODCABAL_REVISION}.cabal \
>               ${WRKSRC}/${MODCABAL_STEM}.cabal
> @@ -71,9 +68,9 @@ MODCABAL_post-extract += \
>  
>  # The dependent sources get downloaded from hackage.
>  .for _package _version _revision in ${MODCABAL_MANIFEST}
> -DISTFILES += {${_package}-${_version}/}${_package}-${_version}.tar.gz:9
> +DISTFILES.hs += {${_package}-${_version}/}${_package}-${_version}.tar.gz
>  .  if ${_revision} > 0
> -DISTFILES += 
> ${_package}-${_version}_${_revision}{${_package}-${_version}/revision/${_revision}}.cabal:9
> +DISTFILES.hs += 
> ${_package}-${_version}_${_revision}{${_package}-${_version}/revision/${_revision}}.cabal
>  .  endif
>  .endfor  # MODCABAL_MANIFEST
>  
> -- 
> 2.41.0
> 
> 
Seems straightforward. Bye bye cumbersomeness, hello awesome new syntax
(yeah, you had to choose a name, which is the most difficult part about
the new syntax !)

Reply via email to