On 2023/07/31 19:02:58 +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas <j...@wxcvbn.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> [...]
> 
> I have already spent time on this yesterday.  While I can understand
> that you love your emacs being up to date, I'm maintaining this port
> and I would have three proposals to compare with my own wip diff.
> So let's hope that said diff addresses all the points mentioned in this
> thread...
> 
> The two main points open to discussion IMO:
> 
> 1. sqlite3: it doesn't seem to add any feature besides being able to
> access sqlite databases from emacs.  So I'm not sure it's worth adding
> another explicit dep...
> 
> 2. tree-sitter: I won't add it right now, since it uses rust at build
> time and I want emacs to stay available on as many architectures as
> possible.  I have a wip diff to make rust optional in
> textproc/tree-sitter, but that can wait until emacs-29.1 is properly
> tested and committed.
> 
> All flavors build-tested on amd64, no_x11 flavor build-tested on sparc64
> and running on amd64.
> 
> Test reports & oks welcome, especially for graphical flavors.

I've used for a day the athena flavor, works fine for me.  (right now
I'm using the 'lucid' flavor that I added locally.)  fwiw ok op@


Thanks!

Reply via email to