On Thu Jul 20, 2023 at 04:31:55PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2023/07/20 17:27, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > Let's start with a quote from an old try:
> > 
> > "Our Xorg server doesn't run under the same uid as the client, the client
> > needs to create the shared memory area with mode 0666.
> > 
> > We are doing the same in misc/screen-shm. Of course, the consequence
> > here would be to do it for all Qt applications."
> > 
> > -- https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=167110468109188&w=2
> > 
> > There was a veto from sthen@, which was perfectly okay and right.  For
> > error analysis and to exclude that this function is not used, I need the
> > shm mode from time to time. I would like to solve it with an environment
> > variable (QT_OPENBSD_SHM_MODE).
> 
> From that mail,
> 
> "What are the consequences of leaving this as-is? (i.e. what's broken
> now that changing this would fix?)"
> 

Nothing is broken and nothing is would fix for now. It just helps me to
debug Qt application or large ecosystem like KDE plasma. When I increase
the debug level I see that shm could not be init and therefore I can not
exclude that exactly this is a problem.

Long story short: It helps me not to always have to build Qt myself.

Reply via email to