On 2023/07/18 20:03, Ashlen wrote: > In any case, a new port for xst seems like a good idea to me, I think > I've had some positive experiences with it before. I can understand why > you might have reservations about stacking patches like that. > > If it's alright with everyone, I'll take a closer look at xst tomorrow > and possibly compare it to other forks of st. If people would be willing > to review and test a written port for either xst or another > well-maintained fork of st that includes quality of life patches, I can > put in the work to make that happen.
Yes certainly. Should be pretty straightforward to adapt from x11/st to make a new port. (I didn't find xst earlier, otherwise I probably would have used that rather than adding the scrollback flavour to st - most other forks appear to have kept the "st" name as-is so there's already one benefit of xst over the others in that it's less ambiguous :)
