Le Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 09:06:26AM +0200, Landry Breuil a écrit :
> Le Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 06:30:15PM +0200, Joel Carnat a écrit :
>
> > I have also solved the "icons" issue I had with Firefox and Thunderbird.
> > Basically, it is because the binaries are known as firefox-default and
> > thunderbird-default in OpenBSD - I noticed this while running Windowmaker
> > and docking those apps. I had to write my own
> > ~/.local/share/applications/{firefox,thunderbird}.desktop files. And it also
> > works to apply an icon to xterm(1). Do you think this package should come
> > with a note about desktop files in MESSAGE or I should rather add those
> > desktop files in the port?
>
> I wont accept such desktop files in the docklike port, feels like a
> kludge to workaround something broken somewhere else. What's the
> difference between your desktop file and the original one ? There are no
> 'default' suffixes in the thunderbird/firefox binaries.. that has to be
> some weird ICCCM property, because xprop on a firefox window indeed
> gives WM_CLASS(STRING) = "Navigator", "firefox-default"
> but i dunno where that comes from. Will have to dig.
ah, seems gdk_set_program_class() in
https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/widget/gtk/nsAppShell.cpp#328
is the one setting that weird name. strange. the -default suffix seems
to come from the update channel set in
https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/moz.configure#2780
- for some reason unknown to me we're not on 'release' but 'default',
probably because we dont get binary updates from mozilla.
so, what have you set in the desktop file to 'fix' that ?
> How about xterm ?
what needs to be done for xterm ?
