On 2023/03/30 16:16, Omar Polo wrote: > On 2023/03/29 22:59:38 -0400, Thomas Frohwein <tfrohw...@fastmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > compton hasn't seen any updates in over 5 years. As far as I can tell, > > the generally accepted successor if picom which we have in ports. I > > don't see a good reason to keep an outdated compositor in the ports > > tree. ok to retire it? > > +1 for me! > > We could even automatically migrate users to picom (there's a flag to > install "compton" symlink), although I don't know how much of the > config format of compton picom currently understands (they dropped > some options IIRC.)
Think I'd prefer a quirk with a custom obsolete_message suggesting picom instead.
