On 2023/02/26 18:27, Pavel Korovin wrote: > On 02/25, A Tammy wrote: > > > > On 2/25/23 11:17, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2023/02/25 11:13, aisha wrote: > > >> On 23/01/23 10:12PM, Pavel Korovin wrote: > > >>> 2. +MODJAVA_VER = 17 > > >>> Keycloak works fine with jdk-17, I don't see any reason for > > >>> downgrading jdk dependnecy > > > Isn't it better to use e.g. "MODJAVA_VER = 11+"? That way it can work > > > with 17, but will also accept whichever version is installed as long > > > as it's sufficient. That's the way most java-based ports work. > > > > > OK with me, I'm not tied to any particular java version. > > I'd keep MODJAVA_VER = 17 because Java 11 is now deprecated: > https://www.keycloak.org/docs/latest/release_notes/index.html
ok, fair enough then.
